During the first week of November 2003, I presented workshops at a Business Chops seminar, sponsored by the Guitar Center and GC Pro; a class at UCLA and at the TAXI Road Rally.
I was struck with the growing gap between two parallel music universes.
The major label music universe is constantly “in your face” in
Los Angeles, on billboards, the radio, and public entertainment media. In that
universe, what counts are the “monster” pop stars, the platinum
sellers and the multimillion dollar marketing budgets.
In that universe, sales of CDs have declined in the last two years and labels
are struggling to find a way to regain market strength and public loyalty. Although
illegal downloads are attributed as the main cause of sales declines, many other
factors may be synergistically responsible. They include—
1. Competition for leisure dollars for other products sold by the conglomerates
that own major labels (videos, video games, hardware, software, audio products,
movies, DVDs, etc.)
2. A recession that has made fewer leisure dollars available for all consumers
and most certainly among the middle and lower income populations.
3. Poor business practices within the labels. There is a glut of product, much
of it mediocre (more than 5000 titles a year), and a 90% failure rate for all
recordings released by major labels. There is too much reliance on back catalogs
(like Beatles and Pink Floyd) and established superstars to carry the profit.
There is a lack of attention to genres other than contemporary rock, country
and historical rock and less commitment to signing and developing artists that
could have the staying power and creativity of so many of our 60’s, 70’s
and 80’s artists. Unfair recording contracts have turned artists into
indentured servants. Finally, the underreporting of royalties to artists has
led to legal scrutiny and has undermined the accusations of thievery leveled
by the major labels against free Internet downloaders.
4. The consolidation of radio networks means fewer spots are available to nonsuperstar
major label artists and this contributes to the 90% failure rate. The large
“promotional fees” paid by major labels to radio stations and charged
back to artists are an increasing burden to major label artists. These fees
are huge and amount to payola.
5. There are also some less reported consequences of legal and illegal downloading.
The availability of downloads opened the public’s awareness of just how
much music was previously inaccessible from major and independent labels. The
public’s thirst for access and its love of music is evident in the huge
numbers of these downloads. In theory, exposure of the music leads to sales—that
is the reasoning behind the conglomerate control of airplay and media. For a
long time, that reasoning led to higher sales of recordings of artists. As the
public gains access to other music, there is some evidence that CD sales are
being spread over a wider number of genres, labels and artists, not just the
ones pushed by major labels.
The Independent Universe
The independent label universe operates on vastly different economic scales
and aesthetic assumptions.
It includes artists and bands that release recordings in every imaginable genre
of music independently of major label distribution and promotion. These labels
have learned to profit on sales as low as 2,500 CDs; and many have sold between
50,000 and 250,000, enough to make profits for labels and artists. They have
learned to develop followings and markets independently of commercial media
exposure.
Their efforts are empowered by the growth of such ancillary organizations and
businesses as Association for Independent Music (AFIM), TAXI, SongNet, Folk
Alliance, Rap Coalition, Gospel Music Association, Just Plain Folks, The Future
of Music Coalition and regionally based songwriter associations.
This independent universe is so decentralized and spread across so many different
genres of music that accurate financial statistics of its dollar value are impossible
to determine. But many estimate that it is a multibillion dollar industry.
Statistics about the number of labels, their sales and financial impacts are
difficult to pin down. First, figures from Sound Scan indicate that approximately
12 to 15% of the gross income of all recordings sold in the United States annually
are by independent labels. Moreover, of approximately 35,000 recordings that
are sold in stores that report to Sound Scan, 30,000 are independent releases.
However, this statistic is somewhat misleading because some labels, such as
Sub Pop and Death Row that call themselves ‘independent’ are in
actuality promoted and distributed by major labels when sales reach contracted-upon
thresholds.
Second, sixty to seventy-five percent of the music sold by independent labels
does not contain bar codes and is not being sold in the retail stores that are
tracked by Sound Scan. Derek Sivers, founder and president of CD Baby, the largest
Internet retailer for independent artists, reports that of the approximately
41,000 artists that collectively sell more than 500,000 recordings annually
on CD Baby, 33,000 are artists that do not bar code their recordings. CD manufacturers
and brokers report similar percentages of bands that do not bother with bar
codes.
Finally, the Sound Scan does not track sales of independent recordings at gigs,
by mail order and through artist-owned independent Web sites; all of which are
significant sources of income to independent artists.
Independents and Revitalization of Local Economies
Many large independent labels are not based in LA, Nashville or New York.
American Gramaphone (Mannheim Steamrollers) is based in Omaha; Rounder in Boston,
New West in Austin. Many artist-owned labels thrive in small towns and cities
and are known only to their followings—some of them quite large—that
hear them perform and pass news about their recordings and performances via
the Internet.
These labels are supporting and being supported by increasing numbers of home
studios (and sales of equipment and software), thriving live music scenes in
cities across America and Canada, musical equipment and audio sales, the growth
of niche magazines, graphic design and production services; CD, cassette and
vinyl manufacturers and a large education business dedicated to teaching artists
and business professionals.
Local music businesses spend money on equipment and services, hire employees;
and contract services from nearby vendors (recording studios, sound reinforcement).
As a band or a music business company expands sales beyond its local community,
it imports money into that community. Growing businesses help grow local economies,
spread money to other businesses and increase tax bases.
To date only one American city has quantified the financial impact and importance
of music to their local economy. In 2001, the city of Austin, Texas made a formal
economic impact study. The impact was significant: over $616 million in economic
activity, almost 11,200 jobs, and over $11 million in city tax revenues was
attributed to music. Most of these revenues were driven by independent artists
and the thriving live music scene that showcases an astonishing variety of music.
The Economics of Small
Independent labels profit with substantially fewer sales than major labels
by keeping recording and promotional costs down and marketing to niche audiences.
Excellent sounding recordings have been recorded and manufactured for about
$7500, a financial outlay within the reach of many artists. Sales of 1000 recordings
at gigs at $15 will recoup that cost. Sales of 5000 recordings at gigs at the
same price earn enough to finance and grow a music business. When costs are
scaled to realistic expectations of sales, labels remain profitable. And, when
sales exceed those forecasts, the artists and the labels thrive. And many have.
Chris Strachwitz, founder of Arhoolie Records, (Tex Mex, Blues, Cajun, Sacred
Steel), coined the phrase “slow selling, long lasting” in the mid-70s
to describe a recording business that does not depend on hits for profits and
whose back catalog is a source of great, lasting music.
Many independent artists sell many thousands of records year after year because
they have become well-loved in their individual genres. These include blues
artists such as Lightning Hopkins and Mance Lipscomb and folk artist Doc Watson.
New age pianist Steven Halpern has sold 11 million recordings in 25 years, and
mandolinist David Grisman’s record company Acoustic Disc has sold more
than 12 million recordings in the last decade.
Some labels have put out recordings by new artists that built solid followings
over the years, such as Sugar Hill (Nickel Creek) and Rounder (Alison Krauss).
This has enabled them to sell nearly a million recordings each. The process
of slowly building artists and their followings is what the major labels used
to call artist development.
Summary
There are two parallel music universes, one imploding, the other growing healthier.
Growing numbers of major label business professionals that are finding themselves
out of work in the major label universe are exploring options in the independent
one, bringing with them the benefit of their experience and contacts. At the
same time, musicians and bands that are not on Billboard’s top 100 and
are out of favor within the major labels are turning to independent labels.
A good example is Delbert McClinton, who is now recording for New West. His
established audience base enabled that label to sell more than 250,000 recordings.
This is good news for the independent universe, which will only benefit more
as the public becomes aware of the fabulous variety of music on these labels
and the music renaissance they have spurred. And this in turn, may spark a revolution
to recapture some of the airwaves for regional and local music and news.
My hope is that the major label universe will recognize that they can benefit
from the health of the independent universe and find ways to support it. Not
only is the independent universe providing valuable artist development, but
major labels will continue to sign artists that have become successful in genres
that the major labels can easily market and promote.
Diane Rapaport is the author of A Music Business Primer and How to Make and
Sell Your Own Recording, published by Prentice Hall.
Some interesting web sites...
www.ifanz.com (mailing list maintenance)
www.selfpromotion.com (really good
information on setting up web sites and listing them on search engines
www.weedshare.com (interesting music
sharing concept)
www.futureofmusic.org (great organization
to know about)
www.bryanfarrish.com
or www.radio-media.com (great stuff
on radio promotion)
www.taxi.com (great organization for songwriters)
www.lefsetz.com (great
music business rants)
Published onAudiocourses.com with kind permission of by Diane
Rapaport Copyright 2003