danexp80
Newbie
Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 2
|
| m-audio firewire 410 vs. 1814 |
 |
|
What are the major differences in these two products other than price? I'm looking in on buying one of the two, however; I'm not quite sure on which is the best deal for me. My studio consists of: Roland XP80 Keyboard, M-Audio BX8 Studio Monitors, Behringer UB1002 Mixer, Shure KSM27 Condenser, Presonus TubePRE, Presonus HP4. I need a new audio interface that will give me a nice clean sound and enough 1/4" I/O's for all my equipment and then some. Which is the better buy for what i want to do? |
Thu Sep 23, 2004 12:13 am |
|
|
danexp80
Newbie
Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 2
|
Oh, and I have an EMU Proteus 2000 Sound Module as well! |
|
Thu Sep 23, 2004 12:14 am |
|
|
|
|
MTammariello
Newbie
Joined: 24 Aug 2007
Posts: 7
|
One main difference I have noticed is the ADAT Lightpipe feature included with the 1814. This will allow you to eventually add on another interface which also has such connection capabilities. If you ever decide to move to a larger or more expensive interface you will most likely be able to connect this one with that for additional capabilites. Also try checking out the Mbox and Mbox2 interfaces. Though these do not have the ADAT Lightpipe features, they give you the latest version of Pro Tools LE rather than an M Powered Pro Tools. I'm not sure how much different the M Powered version is from regular LE because I have never used the M Powered; however, you can get an MBox for about the same price if not cheaper than the 1814. |
|
Fri Aug 24, 2007 7:02 am |
|
|
 
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is Fri May 16, 2008 11:46 am
|
|
|
|
| |
