code:

---

<audiocourses> ahh Hi Nancy.
* Guest66778 has joined #audiocourses
<resol69> Hey there!  Still drinking the morning coffee here.
* Guest66778 is now known as ben_m
<audiocourses> Hi ben.
<audiocourses> what time is nancy?
<ben_m> hi there
* DaniCook has joined #audiocourses
<audiocourses> Hi Dani
<resol69> 10am
<DaniCook> hi all
<audiocourses> ah not so bad huh..
<ben_m> hi dani
<DaniCook> hi ben, hi chris
<resol69> hi Dani
<DaniCook> hiya nancy
<audiocourses> I got a message form mike that he will not be able to make it today.
<ben_m> ok
<DaniCook> ok
<audiocourses> Aidan said he would try with a laptop.
<audiocourses> to connect that is.
<DaniCook> cool
<audiocourses> How you doing ben?
<ben_m> not too bad chris, hows about you?
<audiocourses> I'm good thanks, weekend off rugby, resitng ma bones..
<ben_m> ah, giving the reserves a run out now the titles won eh?
<audiocourses> errr  no..
<audiocourses> lol
<audiocourses> actually yes..
<ben_m> :)
<ben_m> classic tactic
<audiocourses> indeed..
<audiocourses> How you guys doing? nancy and dani??
<DaniCook> i'm well thanks
<resol69> Good. busy at work. and I'm packing,,moving on May 10!
<audiocourses> ooohh err big move nancy..  going far?
<resol69> The next town, North Hollywood. Closer to work and the studio.
<DaniCook> ooo, the glamour
<resol69> Oh yea, Hollywood is really glamourous these days!
<DaniCook> the next town to me is leads, not as good i think
<DaniCook> or leeds even
<audiocourses> Is it glamorous nancy?
<resol69> Nope. Just everyday folk in North Hollywood. Hollywood is pretty sleazy actually.
<DaniCook> ooo, the sleaze
<DaniCook> :-)
<resol69> :)
<audiocourses> I'm pretty ignorant about the scene over there..
<audiocourses> many people live in north hollywood?
<resol69> Yes, a lot of actors and musicians who can't afford to live in the Hollywood Hills (the swanky part of Hollywood)
<resol69> It's part of the San Fernando Valley, which is all part of Los Angeles. Ever seen that old movie Valley Girl with Nick Cage?
<audiocourses> I think so yes.
<resol69> That's where I live.
<resol69> In the suburbs.  Swanky!
<audiocourses> hehe
<audiocourses> Still I imagine it to have an earthy buzz about it if so many people live there with aspirations.?
<resol69> Yes, very cool atmoshphere. Funky shops and restaurants.
<resol69> Y'all should come and visit LA someday. :)
<DaniCook> i'm on my way, thanks
<audiocourses> I must add it to my wish list of places to visit..
<DaniCook> :-)
<resol69> You can have the spare room, Dani :)
<DaniCook> lol, thanks
<audiocourses> So what's new with you Dani?
<DaniCook> not a lot really, had this week off work, bought a new audio/visual system and played with that all week, lol
<audiocourses> you did? sounds interesting..
<DaniCook> it's just a w/screen tv dvd, video and 5.1 surround,
<resol69> oohh surround sound. :)
<audiocourses> just that.. :)
<DaniCook> been driving my gf mad adjusting all the settings, lol
<DaniCook> VISA have dione very well out of us this week, lol
<audiocourses> uh huh the credit card..
<audiocourses> so has it got some neat settings?
<DaniCook> yeah, lot's of different modes for the surround, eq and weird stero effcts,
<DaniCook> abd a monster sub
<audiocourses> cool..
<DaniCook> which shakes cups, lol
<audiocourses> great!
<audiocourses> Got some good material encoding in 5:1?
<DaniCook> ants is on behind me and it sounds great
* audiocourses changes topic to 'Practical Work'
<audiocourses> So lets get on with some stuff
<DaniCook> ok
<audiocourses> How did you practical go?
<DaniCook> the sampling thing?
<ben_m> are they uploaded?
<DaniCook> yes
<ben_m> yes, samples
* resol69 has quit IRC (Connection reset by peer)
<DaniCook> you've upset nancy now
<audiocourses> oops
<DaniCook> she's frightened of samples
<ben_m> eeek
<DaniCook> samplaphobia it's called
<audiocourses> hehe
<ben_m> sounds nasty - my grandad went the same way
<DaniCook> it's treatable now
<ben_m> phew
<DaniCook> sadly in the past it wasn't, i'm sorry for your loss, lol
<ben_m> lol
<DaniCook> they put you in an iron loop
<ben_m> sounds primitive
<DaniCook> it's 16 bit
<ben_m> hehe
<DaniCook> lol
<ben_m> chris - should we wait for nancy or get cracking?
<audiocourses> yes a good idea. I'm sure she will be back asap
<DaniCook> do you think perhaps we should leave masterbation untill afterwards?
<ben_m> lol
<DaniCook> lol
<audiocourses> oh dear
<audiocourses> It's spelt Masturbation anyway Dani.
<ben_m> still lol
<DaniCook> lol, i'm typing with one hand
* audiocourses goes for a piss
<DaniCook> i bet
<ben_m> a 'piss'?
<ben_m> lol
<DaniCook> lol
<ben_m> dani - any feedback from the music you had on that advert in the usa
<DaniCook> not as yet, not heard a peep from US,
<DaniCook> thanks for asking
<ben_m> its a good foot in the door you got there
<ben_m> i liked the quality of the stuff you've got on MP3.com
<DaniCook> i'm hoping so, just have to be patient
* Guest34950 has joined #audiocourses
<DaniCook> thank you, it's nicve to get feedback off people
* Guest34950 is now known as resol69
<DaniCook> especially peers
<ben_m> have you tried selling any of your stuff to publishers for other artists or do you want to do it yourself?
<resol69> sorry AOL crashed. :(
<DaniCook> i don't know how to go about it
<ben_m> hi nancy
<audiocourses> welcome back...  and thank god!
<DaniCook> wb nancy
<resol69> Evil AOL! Can't wait to get rid of that when I move!
<DaniCook> i wouldn't mind publishing
<ben_m> publishings where the £s are
<audiocourses> Yes I've heard horry stories of AOL
<DaniCook> there aren't any around here though
<DaniCook> i haven't got any contacts in the biz
<ben_m> look for A&R people who have signed artists with similiar material to the stuff you are writing - thats a good starting place
<ben_m> there is an A&R directory somewhere with this info
<DaniCook> i'm not sure who i'm like though, lol
<ben_m> yeah, its hard to categorise your own material
<DaniCook> people say savage garden, which really gets up my nose
<DaniCook> abd daniel beddinfield
<ben_m> ha! not a fan then? I've got to say I heard a bit of the Savage Garden in there...sorry!
<ben_m> but I think thats good considering their commercial success
<DaniCook> i think it's our vocal styles
<ben_m> i think you might be right
<DaniCook> the same ppl who like SG like my stuff usually
<DaniCook> so it's a good start i guess
<ben_m> yes, thats a good target market
<DaniCook> mainly women as well, woohoo
<ben_m> look for Savage Gardens A&R guy or management etc
<ben_m> might be worth a punt
<DaniCook> yes, i'll look into it, thyanks ben
<resol69> Dani, don't let your gf hear you!  :)
<ben_m> hehe
<DaniCook> lol, i know nancy
<ben_m> so...practicals
<audiocourses> Ok ben wanna get into practical.. lol
<DaniCook> yup
<ben_m> how'd they go?
<DaniCook> not too bad for me, if i've done it right
<resol69> Still working on it. I had to order some software and I'm learning it. Never did anything w/samples before.
<DaniCook> i had a casio FZ1, lol
<ben_m> nancy - ok dani - you uploaded the samples
<DaniCook> the heaviest sampler in whole wide world
<DaniCook> i have
<ben_m> ok, ill have a look
<DaniCook> how did you want the loop, looping?
<ben_m> well, if its cut correctly i'll just load it into wavelab and loop it, but if you've looped it thats cool
<DaniCook> yeah, i did four bars i think
<ben_m> sounds good, goona check it in audio editor now
<DaniCook> *shake*
<audiocourses> lol
<audiocourses> Fear not Dani
<DaniCook> i can still remember last week, lol
<audiocourses> me 2
<audiocourses> ;)
<DaniCook> ;-)
<ben_m> looks good, no big jumps in level, looks like its been looped taking zero crossings into consideration, timing seems good
<DaniCook> woohoo
<ben_m> only minor criticism I have (and this is really picking) is that a couple of your one shots have a short gap at the start of them but we're only talking between 2-10ms. But thats not the end of the world
<ben_m> did you do this in software
<ben_m> ?
<DaniCook> oops, yes,
<DaniCook> sound forge
<DaniCook> thought i'd trimmed them
<ben_m> its good though, the one shots have been extracted with sympathy for the instrument
<DaniCook> yes, i allways feel sorry for drums
<ben_m> I've got the zoom right up to see it, like I said it's not a massive gap
<ben_m> lol - my drum sympathy
<DaniCook> lol
<ben_m> have you checked this out chris?
<audiocourses> no ben..
<audiocourses> I'll d/l now
<ben_m> ok
<ben_m> did you have any problems doing these tasks dani or were they straightforward enough?
<resol69> Dani, what type of file were the one shots. I couldn't open them, but could open the other loops.
<DaniCook> for me they were ok, it's stuff i've done before at some level
<ben_m> yes, I thought you may be familiar with this kind of work.
<ben_m> Nancy they are .rar files - similiar to zip files
<DaniCook> it's a long time since i've used samples, but once you've done it, it's hard to forget
<DaniCook> it's like riding an emulator
<DaniCook> lol
<ben_m> lol
<ben_m> nancy - you will need a program to decompress them
<ben_m> on PCs we have WinRAR but I don't know Mac equivalent
<resol69> Yes, I have winzip, it just didn't recognize it.
<DaniCook> you still on a mac nancy?
<resol69> No, for class I'm on a PC. Just do music stuff on the MAC
<DaniCook> you might need a rar program for mac
<DaniCook> oh, just get winrar then
<resol69> ok, thanks!
<DaniCook> it's shareware
<DaniCook> it handles nearly every type of file
<ben_m> what software you gonna use for this nancy?
<ben_m> the audio editing not the .rar!
<audiocourses> Im in the same boat I can't open it either nancy
<resol69> EZ Editor.  It was cheap :)
<ben_m> ok
<ben_m> chris - you got winRAR?
<audiocourses> nope
<audiocourses> winzip
<ben_m> http://www.rarlab.com/
<ben_m> small download
<audiocourses> ta
<DaniCook> i found the stuff about audio books interesting research
<resol69> Yea, I had know idea radio drama was still around!
<ben_m> its alive and well in the BBC!
<DaniCook> welcome to radio 4
<audiocourses> ok one shots seem ok
<DaniCook> thanks
<audiocourses> d/l loop now
<audiocourses> slight "blip" on open hat
<audiocourses> when looped
<audiocourses> nothing serious though
<DaniCook> ok
<audiocourses> I agree with ben about trying to get em bang on the money for the start point
<audiocourses> the kick is the worse I think.? ben.?
<ben_m> yes thats right
<ben_m> around 10ms of silence
<DaniCook> bugger
<audiocourses> it's not a major problem, anything below 40msec is not heard as a delay anyway..
<audiocourses> however, lots of it will make the timin of a track "sloppy"
<audiocourses> a bit like having a percussion Midi box at the end of a 10 item chain..
<DaniCook> i can see it in my editor
<ben_m> yes, it would sound 'late'
<DaniCook> not sure how that's happened
<DaniCook> it's noticable, so i would have corrected it
<DaniCook> i've probably uploaded the wrong ones, lol
<audiocourses> The loop "feels" fine
<audiocourses> lol..
<audiocourses> I'm doing that kind of thing often.. up/ld wrong files.
<DaniCook> it's got a gap at the end as well and i never leave gaps at the end! lol
<DaniCook> i used to have a 1mb sampler
<audiocourses> much better levels this week.. :)
<DaniCook> lol
<audiocourses> Well done for that..
<ben_m> yes, good work dani
<DaniCook> thank you
<audiocourses> OK... do you need more feedback on this?
<DaniCook> i don't think so, i can see what was wrong with the samples i uploaded and i know to make sure i check before i upload now as well
<audiocourses> Nancy?... are you ok with what to do?
<resol69> yes, I get it. Just figuring out the software. Hoping to finish this weekend. :)
<audiocourses> I woul lik eto spend half an hour on the week 8 RT subject
<resol69> OK
<DaniCook> ok
* audiocourses changes topic to 'Mastering'
<audiocourses> Anyone done any?
<DaniCook> only for myself
<audiocourses> Good enough.
<audiocourses> Nancy?
<resol69> Sorry, I didn't look at what the subject is for week 8
<audiocourses> Mastering
<resol69> Bits and pieces, not a whole CD
<audiocourses> OK good.
<audiocourses> There will be a practical this week
<DaniCook> ok
<audiocourses> mastering a track.
<audiocourses> This may be tricky for some of the group.. aidan for example.
<audiocourses> However it is there if you would like a go.
<audiocourses> I'll upload a track tomorrow..
<audiocourses> A track from "rumours"
<DaniCook> yes please, at what stage is the recording at when we get it?
<audiocourses> You are getting a Mastered track....
<audiocourses> however, it's a great album for a an exmaple of very low level mastering  lol
<DaniCook> right, and what do you want us to do to it?
<audiocourses> I want you to re-master it..
<audiocourses> digitally re-master if you like.
<DaniCook> ah, now mastering is very subjective, what if ilike the origional master and decide just to up the eq at 100k
<resol69> Just in time for thier new tour in the US. What great marketing..,;)
<audiocourses> The difference should be, once you have completed the task, litteraly "amazing"
<audiocourses> lol
<DaniCook> lol, ok,
<resol69> not that you're putting the pressure on or anything! :)
<audiocourses> hehee
<DaniCook> lol,
<audiocourses> wouldn't dream of that.
<DaniCook> i'll re-record the bugger myself
<audiocourses> good luck dani!
<DaniCook> lol
<audiocourses> some great performances on that album
<audiocourses> So coupled wit the practical there willbe questions
<resol69> We have to deliver and mp3 again?  :(
<DaniCook> does it matter that i hate fleetwood mac?
<audiocourses> Yes please nancy an mp3 version, all mastered.
<audiocourses> Makes no difference if you like the music or not dani.
<DaniCook> i know, hehe
<DaniCook> ever heard fleetwood at 4bit?
<ben_m> does it matter that I have fleetwoods mac? - its a great kagool!
<audiocourses> lol
<DaniCook> rofl!
<ben_m> sorry that was poor... :)
<DaniCook> do american have kagools?
<audiocourses> For you yes, ben.
<ben_m> :)
<DaniCook> or trainspotters?
<resol69> got NO idea what you're talking about.
<ben_m> hehe
<DaniCook> it's a type of contraceptive bancy
<DaniCook> nancy
<resol69> OH, that would have been my last guess. :)
<DaniCook> well, if you wear one, you ain't ever having sex
<ben_m> yes, the mastering of 'rumours' is quite typical of a certain period of mastering I feel, before the compression rat race hotted up.
<audiocourses> Great point ben
<resol69> hmm.sounds like hint there to add some compression...
<DaniCook> and you want it bringing up into to 21st century
<DaniCook> rather than the eighteenth
<audiocourses> The mp3 target audience for this practical is internet streaming..
<DaniCook> ok
<audiocourses> The record company wish to re-release the product..
<DaniCook> at what bandwidth?
<audiocourses> and they have many internet channels for broadcasting..
<audiocourses> hmmmm what you reckon ben?
<ben_m> well, for ADSL you could go for 128kbps
<DaniCook> ok
<ben_m> after that you're looking at 96 or 64kbps
<ben_m> this is presuming material is stereo
<audiocourses> 128 then..
<DaniCook> ok 128 it is
<ben_m> 128 is quite an 'interesting' rate as it is the bridge between the lower and higher quality bitrates
<DaniCook> gonna use sound forge for mp3 this time, bad SX bad SX, get in your basket
<audiocourses> lol
<ben_m> seriously dani, have a look for a prog called Winlame - this is the best MP3 compression I've ever heard and very quick too
<ben_m> uses the lame algorithim
<ben_m> and its free
<DaniCook> i'll have a look for it
<ben_m> http://winlame.sourceforge.net/
<resol69> sounds 'lame' to me.  Hee hee that was bad.
<DaniCook> yup, found it on e-donkey
<ben_m> all pc users have alook at this
<ben_m> nancy, you're going down the same humour route as me
<ben_m> lol
<resol69> lol
<DaniCook> do you know which track we are going to master?
<audiocourses> I'll have a think about that.. I'll try and pick one that sounds real "18th" just for you?
<ben_m> hehe
<DaniCook> lol, thanks chris,
<audiocourses> welcome.. :)
<DaniCook> harpichords and lutes
<audiocourses> lol
<DaniCook> missed the s
<DaniCook> slutes
<DaniCook> lol
<ben_m> hehe
<audiocourses> now Im totally confused
<audiocourses> harpichords and slutes
<DaniCook> don't follow me, i'm lost too
<DaniCook> lol
<audiocourses> vodka again?
<DaniCook> sounds like a real ale
<DaniCook> theakston old peculiar tonight
* audiocourses spots nancy rolling her eyes
<DaniCook> proper beer for a proper northern bloke
<DaniCook> lol
<resol69> lol
<audiocourses> So you guys got the tools for mastering?
<resol69> yes. T-Racks.
<DaniCook> dynasone, t-racks
<audiocourses> seems t-tracks has done some good marketing..
<audiocourses> lol
<DaniCook> i nicked it
<resol69> me too.
<audiocourses> lol
<resol69> Us audio people love to share :)
<audiocourses> you ever used t-tracks Ben?
<DaniCook> it's great isn't it
<ben_m> yes, t-racks is ok. its quite specialised in as much as it is trying to replicae a cewrtain type of sound but its very good at it
<ben_m> i do like it though
<DaniCook> it's a lazy way of mastering for me
<audiocourses> Now see if I was mean..
<ben_m> yes, its a bit of a one box solution , a little like Izotope Ozone
<DaniCook> dynasone is a lot more tweakable
<DaniCook> you can edit the multivband and stuff
<ben_m> chris?
<audiocourses> I would have you uploading after each "tweak"... a catalogue of edits. To keep the producer happy of course.
<ben_m> you feeling mean this week chris?
<ben_m> hehe
<audiocourses> It's good practise to have several versions available for the producer.
<DaniCook> how many edits do you want?
<audiocourses> hmmm
<ben_m> you could try producing more than one bandwith version
<ben_m> for instance 128 stereo, 64 mono
<audiocourses> ahhh.. good idea.
<ben_m> yes, the destination bitrate can affect how you have to master material
<DaniCook> ben, i htought you were a good jedi, but your dark, just like your master
<ben_m> in terms of levels/noise shaping etc
<ben_m> lo @dani
<audiocourses> lol
<ben_m> lol@dani
<ben_m> they call me ben kenobi
<DaniCook> lol
<audiocourses> lol
<ben_m> but instead of a light sabre i have a Shure SM-57
<ben_m> in blue...
* audiocourses peers over at nancy.. all ok nancy?
<DaniCook> lol,
<resol69> Yea
<DaniCook> nancy rolling her hair into buns at the side of her head
<audiocourses> Ben could you indicate some things to watch out for with this practical?
<ben_m> ok...
<resol69> Right, the cinnimon bun look is really in. I though guys liked the princess lea look when she was captured by jabba the hut?
<audiocourses> that told ya dani!
<ben_m> if you are mastering for a particular format you have to be wary of the limitations of the final format - in this case MP3
<audiocourses> yup
<ben_m> MP3 obviously compresses the data and loses 'nimportant' audio
<ben_m> unimportant
<DaniCook> i see what your saying ben, nancy-no, i prefered her on the death star, clothes on,
<resol69> so we can't be too sublt, cos it will just get lost?
<ben_m> yes, to an extent
<resol69> Dani, my bf disagrees.  :)
<DaniCook> lol
<ben_m> remember when we talked about the Haas and precedence effect
<ben_m> sidenote - return of the jedi was her finest moment
<DaniCook> i see he rmore than just a body, lol
<ben_m> well, sounds can 'disappear if they are too quiet or are masked by another sound
<audiocourses> certainly can ben
<DaniCook> especially with a reduced frequncy band
<ben_m> also, as it is for internet radio some of the rules of conventional mastering for radio apply
<ben_m> i.e. high rms levels of sound
<ben_m> and pronounced midrange (vocal area)
<DaniCook> yup
<ben_m> so, at the end of the chain (an odd place to start i know) you may want to use something that will optimise levels for you
<DaniCook> like a maximizer>
<ben_m> prgs such as the Apogee plugins and the Waves L1 and L2 plugins are good examples
<resol69> like normalizing?
<ben_m> yes dani
<DaniCook> ok
<ben_m> kind of like normalising, butusually with a limiter involved
<ben_m> this is after the compression, eq, harmonic excitement etc
<ben_m> following this?
<DaniCook> yes
<resol69> yup
<ben_m> a finaliser/loudness maximiser etc will optimise levels for the final format
<ben_m> this can include producing optimal levels for downsampling for other formats
<DaniCook> right
<ben_m> obviously levels can be adjusted for optimal quantisation to a lower bit rate
<ben_m> which can ultimately reduce artefacts from downsampling
<DaniCook> when you post the wav, can you also put in writing what you want in the foruim please
<audiocourses> ok dani
<DaniCook> thank you
<audiocourses> welcome
<ben_m> are you all familiar with the proceses involved in mastering?
<resol69> some.
<DaniCook> some
<ben_m> ok, there are many stages that are involved although not all need to be used for every track
<ben_m> these include (but are not limited to);
<ben_m> compression - single band and multiband
<ben_m> eq
<ben_m> reverb (very small amounts)
<ben_m> stereo imaging / phase alteration
<ben_m> harmonic excitement (both HF and LF)
<ben_m> limiting/loudness maximising
<ben_m> progs such as t-racks also include a stage to add 'warmth' (tube emulation)
<ben_m> compression is probably the most important stage - do you agree chris?
<audiocourses> Has become "the" most important in recent years yes.
<ben_m> so this should be a big part of your practical
<DaniCook> ok
<ben_m> appropriate use of compression
<resol69> ok
<ben_m> how do you think mastering compression may differ from tracking compression (typically)
<resol69> would you be compressing the mix vs. individual tracks?
<DaniCook> when masterring you risk losing important sounds when other sounds drown push the compressor
<DaniCook> ?
<ben_m> yes, so you''' be dealing with a stereo file, but what are the conceptual differences?
<ben_m> yes dani that is true
<DaniCook> with single band, you have a lot less control?
<ben_m> yes, you certainly do have less control
<resol69> compressing to bring sounds out instead of just controlling levels?
<ben_m> yes, nancy that is a big part of it
<ben_m> well, lets take ratio and threshold settings
<ben_m> in mastering you may want to use different settings to those you may use when tracking
<DaniCook> do you want a harder knee?
<ben_m> when you have the file, experiment with setting the compressor up as you would for tracking and setting it up in a mastering manner
<ben_m> dani - thats upto you whichever you feel offers the best sound
<DaniCook> ok
<ben_m> a mastering compressor may have a low ratio
<ben_m> in the region of 1.2:1 or 1.5:1
<ben_m> maybe not the 4:1 or 6:1 that is common in tracking
<ben_m> however, the threshold may also be set to a lower level than usual, so you are compressing a lot of the signal bt at a low ratio
<ben_m> rather than peaks at a higher ratio
<DaniCook> i get it
<ben_m> does that make sense?
<resol69> yup
<ben_m> even just using a sinble band compressor with settings similiar to the above on a mix will make a lot of difference
<ben_m> of course, there are times when these rules aren't adhered to
<ben_m> some dance material will use very extreme ratio, and release levels to create noticeable 'pumping'
<resol69> If you like that sort of thing.
<ben_m> yes, its down to the material
<audiocourses> Ben that's great.
<DaniCook> brick wall compression
<ben_m> i doubt pumping would suit fleetwood mac
<resol69> lol
<ben_m> :)
<audiocourses> Thanks ben that's great stuff.
<DaniCook> yes, thanks ben
<ben_m> no problem guys
<audiocourses> it's now 20:00 here in UK
<audiocourses> just briefly the questions were good for RT
<DaniCook> good, thanks
<audiocourses> so well done again.
<resol69> great
<audiocourses> there will be a similar amount this week.
<DaniCook> ok
<audiocourses> How was MT this week ben?
<ben_m> good - did you prefer the shorter specific questions?
<resol69> yes
<DaniCook> yes
<ben_m> mike didnt make it though
<DaniCook> beavers
<ben_m> dont be too eager in your answers lol
<ben_m> damn beavers
<DaniCook> lol
<audiocourses> yeah mike has had terrible connection problems.. phone line been out of order..
<ben_m> ok
<audiocourses> Crossing my fingers for him.
<ben_m> yeah, me too
<audiocourses> So is MT more specific quesitons again?
<DaniCook> communication disruption can mean only one thing......invasion
<ben_m> hehe
<resol69> of the body snatchers?
<ben_m> night of the killer beavers
<DaniCook> lol
<ben_m> they've ruined the canadian communications infrastructure
* audiocourses thinks it must be the Easter Bunny Fever..
<DaniCook> lol
<ben_m> with their infernal nibbling
<DaniCook> rofl
<audiocourses> well I gotta clear off soon guys.
<ben_m> yeah, me too
<DaniCook> are the questions on mastering this week chris?
<resol69> me too, much packing to do :(
<audiocourses> good luck nancy
<resol69> Thanks!
<audiocourses> yes they are dani
<DaniCook> ok,
<audiocourses> will be all ready tomorrow.
<DaniCook> right, see you all next week then, good luck nancy
<ben_m> MIDI ffor MT
<resol69> So long all, Happy Easter!
<DaniCook> happy easter
<ben_m> yeah, good luck Nancy!
<resol69> thanks!
<resol69> MIDI yeeww.
<DaniCook> if you get stuch nancy, message me
<DaniCook> stuck
<resol69> will do.
<resol69> bye all
<ben_m> right, see you all later
<audiocourses> see ya
<DaniCook> bye
* resol69 has left #audiocourses
<DaniCook> by chris, bye ben
<audiocourses> see ya
<ben_m> cheers dani
* DaniCook has left #audiocourses

---