Home About AC Updates AC Radio AC Blog AC Courses Forum
 
FAQ Profile Members Register Groups PM's Search Login/Out

Week 7 - Practical - Remixing/Dance Production Techniques

Last Thread | Next Thread  >


This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics. This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.

Forum Index > Music Technology 01 - 2004

Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next


Author Thread
ben m



Joined: 15 Sep 2002
Posts: 337
Location: UK
Week 7 - Practical - Remixing/Dance Production Techniques  Reply with quote  

This week I would like to delve a little further into some of the technique we have touched upon in recent weeks.

I have uploaded a recent track of mine, a kind of house/big beat style tune, to the upload section - it's in my folder in a sub folder called "Sanctified"

There are 2 files at present in the folder, the song I have uploaded and a short clip of the song I lifted the vocal sample from - 'Sanctified' by The Commodores.

We can use this thread to discuss some of the techniques that have been implemented in the song.

To start with we'll examine the vocal sample.
As you can hear the vocal sample has had some editing and processing applied - what has been done and how?

Remember to post in this thread!
_________________
ben@audiocourses.com
Post Mon Apr 19, 2004 7:12 pm
 View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
iNSTiNCT2765



Joined: 05 Nov 2003
Posts: 60
Location: Denmark
 Reply with quote  

hey ben, i can't download the sanctified mp3, i get some permission denied error type message but i got the commodores excerpt though...

- aman
Post Mon Apr 19, 2004 10:41 pm
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger

AUdIoCoUrSeS



Joined: 31 Oct 2002
Posts: 2014
Groove It Up  Reply with quote  

Instinct try again now dude, it seemed to have some odd permissions set on that one.

I fink it's fixed.

Great track Ben!
_________________
It's all in the ears. - Learn the concepts not the software. Audio Courses is a way into the music business for you
Post Tue Apr 20, 2004 12:37 am
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger ICQ Number
hoggs33



Joined: 09 Feb 2004
Posts: 55
Location: Nottingham, England
 Reply with quote  

Hi Ben - Love the track (Sanctified) by the way. Comments on the vocal after first listen:-

Obviously been stretched to fit the tempo of your track - without sounding chipmunkish!! as the original is somewhat slower.

I would seem also that sections have been put in a smapler and then played back or small sections of a vocal line cut up and put in the song.

Plently of panning going on!!!!

After Sundays workshop I thought I would have a go at putting some of the vocals from Stuff Like That onto a dance track I wrote - I have had to stretch the vocals as my track has a faster BPM - didn't realise I could do that in Sonar so was chuffed to **** when I realised I could. My track was in a different key so have tried to allow for that also - it seems to work for the most part - better than the original anyway!!!!! I hope to have it finished in a day or two and will upload it into my folder when its finished.

Duncan
Post Thu Apr 22, 2004 2:48 am
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger ICQ Number

ben m



Joined: 15 Sep 2002
Posts: 337
Location: UK
More Vocal Questions  Reply with quote  

Good work Duncan!

Ok, so we know that it has been timestretched to fit a new tempo, and that the timestretching has been done independent of pitch.

Lets look at the original vocal sample again - there is a kick drum that starts playing throughout. This neeeded to be removed as i wasn't using the vocal sample in the same place relative to beat 1 as in the original.

Question So how did I remove it?

Hint #1 - EQ was used, but not as the main process. For a 'Brucie Bonus' 8O - can you identify the dominant/fundamental freq. of the kick drum?
The basic EQ in Cubase would be more than enough to work this one out.

Hint #2 - If you open the original in an audio editor and look at the panning you will get a big clue.

Also, I didn't use a sampler to trigger the sample - all the panning and stuttering you identified was done in a sequencer - again, how may I have done this?

I'd like you to listen to the intro, and listen to the word 'sanctified' that is played just before the 'roll the drums' sample. Anything else you've noticed? - hint - we've covered it in the Sampling questions.

And are there any effects on the vocal sample?

Finally, in the middle buildup as the drums kick in whats happening with the vocals?

I'd like more input from everyone.

Duncan - looking forward to hearing your "Stuff like that" remix - mash it up one-time rudeboy!
_________________
ben@audiocourses.com
Post Thu Apr 22, 2004 7:26 am
 View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
hoggs33



Joined: 09 Feb 2004
Posts: 55
Location: Nottingham, England
 Reply with quote  

Hi Ben - Just uploaded my dance mix of Stuff 0 it is in my folder - I have called it Dance Like That (Dad)!!!!!

Not sure if the mix is quite happening yet but you shuold get the general idea.

Dunc
Post Sun Apr 25, 2004 5:15 pm
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger ICQ Number

griff505



Joined: 23 Feb 2004
Posts: 68
Location: Bristol
 Reply with quote  

Sounds to me like you have looped a section in the middle of the word 'sanctified' to increase its length.
Post Mon Apr 26, 2004 2:15 am
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger ICQ Number
ben m



Joined: 15 Sep 2002
Posts: 337
Location: UK
More Effort Needed...  Reply with quote  

Ok,

I'll give you a hint but you'll still need to think logically.

Look at the original vocal waveform.

We have the vocals panned pretty much hard to one side, and a kick drum panned centrally.
Therefore, how could we remove the kick drum reasonably effectively?
If it helps think in algebraic terms! (slightly obtuse hint)

griff - you're close, it's actually time-stretched rather than looped in a sampler. You can often tell the difference if you listen closely. A looped sample will be identifiable by it the sound of 'looping' (so you'll hear a specific part of the waveform repeating) whereas Time Stretching produces a more slurred result (result of the sample being vut into parts and then stretched). In this case you can hear the vocal vibrato being 'slurred'.

Ok, what I'd like you all to do is produce an audio file of the vocal sample with the kick drum removed, and the sample time stretched to 130bpm. The sample will obviously need to be edited so that it loops well (in terms of zero corssings etc and musically in terms of beats etc)

I'd also like you to have a go at the tasks I mentioned earlier in the thread.

cheers,
ben m
_________________
ben@audiocourses.com
Post Tue Apr 27, 2004 7:16 am
 View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger

hoggs33



Joined: 09 Feb 2004
Posts: 55
Location: Nottingham, England
 Reply with quote  

Hi Ben - been having a look at the vocal sample - Using wavelab I have deleted the left (i think that's right) channel where the kick drum is panned. It does however still appear on the vocal track panned to the right. I have reduced the kick quite a lot with EQ wihtout affecting the vocal too much - did a low shelf up to about 160 Hz which got rid of mist of it but not all - dominant frequency around 80 to 160Hz?.

I am struggling to eliminate the kick drum completely though - any more clues?

Duncan
Post Wed Apr 28, 2004 12:06 am
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger ICQ Number

This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics. This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.
Forum Jump:
Jump to:  
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
All times are GMT.
The time now is Fri May 16, 2008 4:39 pm
  Display posts from previous:      

ACF + topic RSS feed 

Audio School © 2008 Audio Courses